Versioned Archive and Review of Biotic Interactions
and Taxon Names Found within globalbioticinteractions/dopi
hash://md5/5092adc224b66f397c752f6f2071ed53
by Nomer, Elton and Preston, three naive review
bots
Life on Earth is sustained by complex interactions between organisms
and their environment. These biotic interactions can be captured in
datasets and published digitally. We present a review and archiving
process for such an openly accessible digital interactions dataset of
known origin and discuss its outcome. The dataset under review, named
globalbioticinteractions/dopi, has fingerprint
hash://md5/5092adc224b66f397c752f6f2071ed53, is 35.1MiB in size and
contains 101,538 interaction with 1 unique type of association (e.g.,
visitsFlowersOf) between 1,887 primary taxon (e.g., Bombus pascuorum)
and 1,241 associated taxon (e.g., Centaurea nigra). This report includes
detailed summaries of interaction data, a taxonomic review from multiple
catalogs, and an archived version of the dataset from which the reviews
are derived.
Introduction
Data Review and Archive
Data review and archiving can be a time-consuming process, especially
when done manually. This review report aims to help facilitate both
activities. It automates the archiving of datasets, including Darwin
Core archives, and is a citable backup of a version of the dataset.
Additionally, an automatic review of species interaction claims made in
the dataset is generated and registered with Global Biotic Interactions
(J. H. Poelen, Simons,
and Mungall 2014).
This review includes summary statistics about, and observations
about, the dataset under review:
Balfour, N.J., Castellanos, M.C., Goulson, D., Philippides, A. and
Johnson, C., 2022. DoPI: The Database of Pollinator Interactions.
Ecology, 103, e3801.
https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/dopi/archive/f634d6d77db4e720cd7a53598e10ac6505e311e8.zip
2025-07-04T23:35:25.516Z hash://md5/5092adc224b66f397c752f6f2071ed53
For additional metadata related to this dataset, please visit https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/dopi
and inspect associated metadata files including, but not limited to,
README.md, eml.xml, and/or globi.json.
Methods
The review is performed through programmatic scripts that leverage
tools like Preston (Elliott
et al. 2025), Elton (Kuhn, Poelen, and Leinweber 2025), Nomer
(Salim and Poelen
2025), globinizer (J. Poelen, Seltmann, and Mietchen 2024)
combined with third-party tools like grep, mlr, tail and head.
The review process can be described in the form of the script below
1.
# get versioned copy of the dataset (size approx. 35.1MiB) under review
elton pull globalbioticinteractions/dopi
# generate review notes
elton review globalbioticinteractions/dopi\
> review.tsv
# export indexed interaction records
elton interactions globalbioticinteractions/dopi\
> interactions.tsv
# export names and align them with the Catalogue of Life using Nomer
elton names globalbioticinteractions/dopi\
| nomer append col\
> name-alignment.tsv
network diagram showing the taxon family to taxon family interaction
claims in the dataset under review as interpreted by the Catalogue of
Life via Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024)
network diagram showing the taxon kingdom to taxon kingom
interaction claims in the dataset under review as interpreted by the
Catalogue of Life via Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen
2024)
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values
format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values
format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
metadata of this review expressed in Zenodo record metadata
Archived Dataset
Note that data.zip file in this
archive contains the complete, unmodified archived dataset under
review.
Biotic Interactions
Biotic Interaction Data
Model
In this review, biotic interactions (or biotic associations) are
modeled as a primary (aka subject, source) organism interacting with an
associate (aka object, target) organism. The dataset under review
classified the primary/associate organisms with specific taxa. The
primary and associate organisms The kind of interaction is documented as
an interaction type.
The dataset under review, named globalbioticinteractions/dopi, has
fingerprint hash://md5/5092adc224b66f397c752f6f2071ed53, is 35.1MiB in
size and contains 101,538 interaction with 1 unique type of association
(e.g., visitsFlowersOf) between 1,887 primary taxon (e.g., Bombus
pascuorum) and 1,241 associated taxon (e.g., Centaurea nigra).
An exhaustive list of indexed interaction claims can be found in
gzipped csv, tsv and parquet archives. To facilitate
discovery, a preview of claims available in the gzipped html page at indexed-interactions.html.gz are
shown below.
The exhaustive list was used to create the following data summaries
below.
Sample of Indexed Interaction Claims
sourceTaxonName
interactionTypeName
targetTaxonName
referenceCitation
Eupeodes corollae
visitsFlowersOf
Armeria maritima
G.F.S. Scott-Elliot, 1896. The Flora of Dumfriesshire. J. Maxwell,
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/12232
Rhingia sp.
visitsFlowersOf
Armeria maritima
G.F.S. Scott-Elliot, 1896. The Flora of Dumfriesshire. J. Maxwell,
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/12232
Hilara maura
visitsFlowersOf
Armeria maritima
G.F.S. Scott-Elliot, 1896. The Flora of Dumfriesshire. J. Maxwell,
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/12232
Anasimyia sp.
visitsFlowersOf
Menyanthes sp.
A.E. Stubbs et al., 1978. A Dipterists handbook. Amateur
Entomologists Society,
https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/A_dipterist_s_handbook.html?id=294QAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Most Frequently Mentioned Interaction Types (up to 20 most
frequent)
interactionTypeName
count
visitsFlowersOf
101538
Most Frequently Mentioned Primary Taxa (up to 20 most
frequent)
sourceTaxonName
count
Bombus pascuorum
13522
Apis mellifera
10306
Bombus lapidarius
9563
Bombus terrestris
7585
Bombus lucorum/terrestris
7503
Bombus lucorum
4295
Bombus pratorum
3635
Bombus hortorum
2746
Bombus sp.
2635
Meligethes sp.
2372
Pegoplata aestiva
2360
Bombus hypnorum
2067
Episyrphus balteatus
1895
Scathophaga stercoraria
704
Bombus vestalis
693
Bombus humilis
627
Bombus muscorum
626
Eristalis tenax
567
Brachypterus sp.
565
Most Frequently Mentioned Associate Taxa (up to 20 most
frequent)
targetTaxonName
count
Centaurea nigra
6442
Rubus sp.
5296
Calluna vulgaris
4450
Ranunculus repens
3145
Erica cinerea
3039
Rubus fruticosus agg.
2606
Lotus corniculatus
2493
Cirsium arvense
2401
Heracleum sphondylium
1950
Cirsium palustre
1534
Symphytum sp.
1400
Senecio jacobaea
1374
Centaurea scabiosa
1263
Trifolium repens
1176
Erica tetralix
1152
Ranunculus acris
1113
Taraxacum officinale agg.
1022
Lavandula sp.
998
Succisa pratensis
946
Most Frequent Interactions between Primary and Associate Taxa
(up to 20 most frequent)
sourceTaxonName
interactionTypeName
targetTaxonName
count
Bombus lapidarius
visitsFlowersOf
Centaurea nigra
1781
Apis mellifera
visitsFlowersOf
Calluna vulgaris
1510
Apis mellifera
visitsFlowersOf
Erica cinerea
1469
Bombus pascuorum
visitsFlowersOf
Centaurea nigra
1286
Bombus lapidarius
visitsFlowersOf
Lotus corniculatus
1097
Pegoplata aestiva
visitsFlowersOf
Ranunculus repens
1022
Bombus lucorum/terrestris
visitsFlowersOf
Calluna vulgaris
946
Bombus pascuorum
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
812
Bombus lucorum/terrestris
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
782
Bombus lucorum/terrestris
visitsFlowersOf
Erica cinerea
713
Bombus terrestris
visitsFlowersOf
Centaurea nigra
684
Bombus terrestris
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
630
Apis mellifera
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
622
Bombus pascuorum
visitsFlowersOf
Lotus corniculatus
592
Bombus hypnorum
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
543
Bombus lucorum/terrestris
visitsFlowersOf
Erica tetralix
527
Bombus pratorum
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
521
Bombus lucorum
visitsFlowersOf
Rubus sp.
479
Bombus pascuorum
visitsFlowersOf
Cirsium palustre
460
Interaction Networks
The figures below provide a graph view on the dataset under review.
The first shows a summary network on the kingdom level, and the second
shows how interactions on the family level. It is important to note that
both network graphs were first aligned taxonomically using the Catalogue
of Life. Please refer to the original (or verbatim) taxonomic names for
a more original view on the interaction data.
Interactions on taxonomic kingdom rank as
interpreted by the Catalogue of Life download
svgInteractions on the taxonomic family rank
as interpreted by the Catalogue of Life. download
svg
Another way to discover the dataset under review is by searching for
it on the GloBI
website.
Taxonomic Alignment
As part of the review, all names are aligned against various name
catalogs (e.g., col, ncbi, discoverlife, gbif, itis, wfo, mdd, tpt,
pbdb, and worms). These alignments can help review name usage or aid in
selecting of a suitable taxonomic name resource.
Sample of Name Alignments
providedName
relationName
resolvedCatalogName
resolvedName
Agastache foeniculum
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
col
Agastache foeniculum
Ceanothus
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
col
Ceanothus
Euclidia glyphica
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
col
Euclidia glyphica
Pteridium aquilinum
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
col
Pteridium aquilinum
Distribution of Taxonomic Ranks of Aligned Names by Catalog.
Names that were not aligned with a catalog are counted as NAs. So, the
total number of unaligned names for a catalog will be listed in their NA
row.
resolvedCatalogName
resolvedRank
count
col
NA
355
col
genus
578
col
species
2170
col
subgenus
5
col
subspecies
85
col
variety
6
discoverlife
NA
2952
discoverlife
species
172
gbif
NA
30
gbif
family
1
gbif
genus
599
gbif
species
2478
gbif
subspecies
108
gbif
variety
12
itis
NA
1352
itis
genus
510
itis
species
1255
itis
subgenus
1
itis
subspecies
6
itis
variety
4
mdd
NA
3124
ncbi
NA
292
ncbi
genus
591
ncbi
section
1
ncbi
species
2229
ncbi
subgenus
17
ncbi
subspecies
5
ncbi
varietas
3
pbdb
NA
2816
pbdb
family
1
pbdb
genus
264
pbdb
species
43
tpt
NA
3120
tpt
genus
3
tpt
species
1
wfo
NA
1906
wfo
genus
324
wfo
species
885
wfo
subspecies
29
wfo
variety
4
worms
NA
2538
worms
genus
279
worms
species
306
worms
subspecies
6
Name relationship types per catalog. Name relationship type
“NONE” means that a name was not recognized by the associated catalog.
“SAME_AS” indicates either a “HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME” or “SYNONYM_OF” name
relationship type. We recognize that “SYNONYM_OF” encompasses many types
of nomenclatural synonymies (ICZN 1999) (e.g., junior synonym, senior
synonyms).
resolvedCatalogName
relationName
count
col
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
2785
col
NONE
357
col
SYNONYM_OF
793
discoverlife
NONE
3002
discoverlife
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
220
discoverlife
SYNONYM_OF
43
discoverlife
HOMONYM_OF
24
gbif
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
3675
gbif
NONE
30
gbif
SYNONYM_OF
1412
itis
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
1799
itis
NONE
1369
itis
SYNONYM_OF
129
mdd
NONE
3224
ncbi
SAME_AS
2861
ncbi
NONE
299
ncbi
SYNONYM_OF
103
pbdb
NONE
2883
pbdb
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
345
pbdb
SYNONYM_OF
11
tpt
NONE
3220
tpt
SYNONYM_OF
1
tpt
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
3
wfo
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
1195
wfo
NONE
1974
wfo
SYNONYM_OF
256
wfo
HAS_UNCHECKED_NAME
190
worms
NONE
2593
worms
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
695
worms
SYNONYM_OF
84
List of Available Name Alignment Reports
catalog name
alignment results
col
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
ncbi
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
discoverlife
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
gbif
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
itis
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
wfo
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
mdd
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
tpt
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
pbdb
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
worms
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
Additional Reviews
Elton, Nomer, and other tools may have difficulties interpreting
existing species interaction datasets. Or, they may misbehave, or
otherwise show unexpected behavior. As part of the review process,
detailed review notes are kept that document possibly misbehaving, or
confused, review bots. An sample of review notes associated with this
review can be found below.
In addition, you can find the most frequently occurring notes in the
table below.
: Most frequently occurring review notes, if any.
For additional information on review notes, please have a look at the
first 500 Review Notes in html format
or the download full gzipped csv or tsv archives.
GloBI Review Badge
As part of the review, a review badge is generated. This review badge
can be included in webpages to indicate the review status of the dataset
under review.
Note that if the badge is green, no review notes were generated. If
the badge is yellow, the review bots may need some help with
interpreting the species interaction data.
GloBI Index Badge
If the dataset under review has been registered with
GloBI, and has been succesfully indexed by GloBI, the GloBI Index
Status Badge will turn green. This means that the dataset under review
was indexed by GloBI and is available through GloBI services and derived
data products.
If you’d like to keep track of reviews or index status of the dataset
under review, please visit GloBI’s dataset index 5 for
badge examples.
Discussion
This review and archive provides a means of creating citable versions
of datasets that change frequently. This may be useful for dataset
managers, including natural history collection data managers, as a
backup archive of a shared Darwin Core archive. It also serves as a
means of creating a trackable citation for the dataset in an automated
way, while also including some information about the contents of the
dataset.
This review aims to provide a perspective on the dataset to aid in
understanding of species interaction claims discovered. However, it is
important to note that this review does not assess the quality
of the dataset. Instead, it serves as an indication of the open-ness6 and FAIRness (Wilkinson et
al. 2016; Trekels et al. 2023) of the dataset: to perform this
review, the data was likely openly available, Findable,
Accessible, Interoperable and
Reusable. The current Open-FAIR assessment is
qualitative, and a more quantitative approach can be implemented with
specified measurement units.
This report also showcases the reuse of machine-actionable
(meta)data, something highly recommended by the FAIR Data Principles
(Wilkinson et al.
2016). Making (meta)data machine-actionable enables more precise
procesing by computers, enabling even naive review bots like Nomer and
Elton to interpret the data effectively. This capability is crucial for
not just automating the generation of reports, but also for facilitating
seamless data exchanges, promoting interoperability.
Acknowledgements
We thank the many humans that created us and those who created and
maintained the data, software and other intellectual resources that were
used for producing this review. In addition, we are grateful for the
natural resources providing the basis for these human and bot
activities. Also, thanks to https://github.com/zygoballus for helping
improve the layout of the review tables.
Author contributions
Nomer was responsible for name alignments. Elton carried out dataset
extraction, and generated the review notes. Preston tracked, versioned,
and packaged, the dataset under review.
Kuhn, Tobias, and Michel Dumontier. 2014. “Trusty URIs:
Verifiable, Immutable, and Permanent Digital Artifacts for Linked
Data.” In The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges,
edited by Valentina Presutti, Claudia d’Amato, Fabien Gandon, Mathieu
d’Aquin, Steffen Staab, and Anna Tordai, 395–410. Cham: Springer
International Publishing.
Poelen, Jorrit H. (ed.). 2024. “Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources Hash://Sha256/
B60c0d25a16ae77b24305782017b1a270b79b5d1746f832650 F2027ba536e276
Hash://Md5/17f1363a277ee0e4ecaf1b91c665e47e.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12695629.
Poelen, Jorrit H., James D. Simons, and Chris J. Mungall. 2014.
“Global Biotic Interactions: An Open Infrastructure to Share and
Analyze Species-Interaction Datasets.”Ecological
Informatics 24 (November): 148–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.08.005.
Trekels, Maarten, Debora Pignatari Drucker, José Augusto Salim, Jeff
Ollerton, Jorrit Poelen, Filipi Miranda Soares, Max Rünzel, Muo Kasina,
Quentin Groom, and Mariano Devoto. 2023. “WorldFAIR Project (D10.1) Agriculture-related pollinator
data standards use cases report.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8176978.
Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,
Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al.
2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific
Data Management and Stewardship.”Scientific Data 3 (1).
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.